Development and Psychometric Properties of MKDP Day’s Instrument as the Measurement of Personality Based on Worker in Kalimantan Selatan

Authors

  • M.Syarif Hidayatullah Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • Hayatun Thaibah Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29080/ipr.v4i1.646

Keywords:

personality, worker, MKDP day's instrument

Abstract

The personality of a worker or employee is one of the important things to know. However, the development of personality measurement tools made directly in Indonesia is still relatively small. This study aims to develop and identify the psychometric properties of the MKDP Day's Instrument as a personality measurement tool in the context of the workforce in South Kalimantan. The research subjects were 1,123 people between the age of 20-30 years. MKDP Day's Instrument was made by researchers consisting of motivation, cooperation, discipline, and leadership dimensions by taking into account the personality theory of Needs from Murray and Papi Kostick from Kostick. The reliability test used a composite score with a stratified alpha coefficient. The validity test used was confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The result of the reliability test is 0.832. The four dimensions of the instrument were able to explain 22% of the variables. It found 19 factors that can be formed on the instrument. There are 21 valid items from the initial 60 items with an uneven distribution between the dimensions. Further instrument development is needed to produce better psychometric properties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

M.Syarif Hidayatullah, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Department of Psychology

Hayatun Thaibah, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Department of Special Education

References

Anitei, M., Stoica, I. & Samsonescu, M. (2012). Particularities of personality traits and perceived stress at workplace for the young workers in Romania. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84 (2013), 1010 – 1014

Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289 - 303.

Efendi, F. (2020). Analisis Kompetensi, Sarana Prasarana Dan Perencanaan Program Pelatihan Terhadap Kualitas Tenaga Kerja Pada Dinas Tenaga Kerja Dan Transmigrasi Kabupaten Balangan Kalimantan Selatan. KINDAI, 16(2), 177-200.

Fiernaningsih, N. (2017). Pengaruh kepribadian terhadap kinerja karyawan di Hotel Elresas

Furr, R.M. & Bacharach, V.R., (2013). Psychometrics: An introduction. Sage

Hartati, S. (1991). Keterlibatan kerja ditinjau dari tes kepribadian karyawan. Lembaga Penelitian Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we Know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 46 (6), 493 - 504.

Isa, K., Tenah, S. S., Atim, A., & Jam, N. A. (2019). Leading Happiness: Leadership and Happiness at a Workplace. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(3), 6551-6553.

Jakaria, R. B., & Putra, B. I. (2020). Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Psikologi Industri. Umsida Press, 1-119.

Kierstead, J. (1998). Personality and Job Performance: A Research Overview. Policy, Research and Communications Branch Public Service Commission of Canada

Lusiana, H. (2018). Analisis Kinerja Karyawan Terhadap Produktifitas Kerja. At-Tadbir: jurnal ilmiah manajemen, 2(1).

Murray, H. A. (2008). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc

Naisaban, L. (2003). Psikologi jung: tipe kepribadian manusia dan rahasia sukses dalam hidup. Gramedia.

Periantalo, J., & Azwar, S. (2017). Pengembangan skala kepribadian siswa SMA dari tipologi kepribadian Jung dan Myers-Briggs. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 1 (2), 191 – 207

Pituch, K.A. & Stevens, J.P., (2015). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS. Routledge.

Purwoko, A. P. (2012). Peningkatan Produktivitas Pegawai Melalui Rekrutmen Berdasarkan Karakteristik Kepribadian Individu. Civil Service Journal, 6(2 November).

Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (1), 30 – 43.

Tirtawinata, C. M. (2013). Mengenal dan menemukan diri melalui kebersamaan dengan orang lain. Humaniora, 4(2), 1309-1319.

Triwahyuni, A., Purwono, U., Sadarjoen, S.S. & Sapri, E.R., (2019). Pengembangan Millon Personality Type Inventory (MPTI) sebagai Instrumen Pengukuran Kepribadian di Indonesia. Journal of Psychological Science and Profession, 3(2), pp.65-74.

Van der Walt, H.S. (2002). Meta-analyses of the relationship between personality measurement and job performance in South Africa. Presentation: SIOPSA Conference, Pretoria, 13-14 June 2002

Widhiarso, W. (2011). Menghitung koefisien Alpha berstrata. Manuskrip tidak dipublikasikan.

Widhiarso, W. & Ravand, H., (2014). Estimating reliability coefficient for multidimensional measures: A pedagogical illustration. Review of psychology, 21(2), pp.111-121.

Widhiarso, W., (2009). Koefisien reliabilitas pada pengukuran kepribadian yang bersifat multidimensi. Psikobuana, 1(1), pp.39-48.

Widyasari, R., Syahlani, S. P., & Santosa, K. A. (2007). Pengaruh kepribadian terhadap kinerja karyawan berpendidikan tinggi: Analisis pada perusahaan peternakan di Jawa Tengah dan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakrta. KINERJA, 11 (1), 40 – 49

Yesil, S., & Sozbilir, F. (2012). An empirical investigation into the impact of personality on individual innovation behaviour in the workplace. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81 (2013), 540 – 551

Downloads

Published

2021-12-23

How to Cite

Hidayatullah, M., & Thaibah, H. . (2021). Development and Psychometric Properties of MKDP Day’s Instrument as the Measurement of Personality Based on Worker in Kalimantan Selatan. Indonesian Psychological Research, 4(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.29080/ipr.v4i1.646